| Enck et al., (2008) | Germany | N/A | E. coli DSM 17252,E. faecalis DSM 16440 | 1.35 × 108-4.05 × 108 | 150 | 147 | 77 | 72 | 73 | 75 | 8 weeks | Global symptoms and abdominal pain | NNT: males 2.49 (1.76-4.22), females 3.98 (2.55-9.13) |
| Enck et al., (2009) | Germany | N/A | E. coli DSM 17252 | 6.8 × 107-2.0 × 108 | 151 | 147 | 76 | 72 | 75 | 75 | 8 weeks | Global symptoms and abdominal pain | Responder rate: males 22.6% vs 7.2%, females 15.5% vs 2.5% |
| Ludidi et al., (2014) | The Netherlands | Rome III | L. casei W56,L. salivarius W57,L. lactis W58,L. acidophilus NCFM,L. rhamnosus W71 | 5.0 × 109 | 13 | 27 | 6 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 6 weeks | Abdominal pain (visceral perception) | MSS: males −1.18 (−1.80 to −0.25) vs 0.93 (−3.87 to 1.43), females −0.06 (−3.77 to 1.64) vs −1.49 (−7.42 to −0.32) |
| Mack et al., (2022) | Germany | Rome III | E. coli DSM 17252,E. faecalis DSM 16440 | 1.3 × 108-3.9 × 108 | 187 | 197 | 56 | 131 | 63 | 134 | 26 weeks | Global symptoms and abdominal pain | IBS-GAI: males 16.1% vs 17.2%, females 18.0% vs 13.1% |
| Quigley et al., (2023) | US, UK/Ireland | Rome IV | B.hydrogenotrophica | 2.0 × 1010-2.0 × 1011 | 96 | 269 | 50 | 127 | 46 | 142 | 8 weeks | Bowel habit and abdominal pain | Overall response: males 19.1% vs 20.0%, females 26.0% vs 16.7% |
| Preston et al., (2018) | US, Canada | Rome III | L. acidophilus CL1285,L. casei LBC80R,L. rhamnosus CLR2 | 1.0 × 1011 | 45 | 68 | 16 | 21 | 29 | 47 | 12 weeks | Global symptoms and abdominal pain | Improvement in QOL; IBS-D only in males |
| Chang et al., (2024) | South Korea | Rome III | B. longum IDCC 4101,B. bifidum IDCC 4201, B. lactis IDCC 4301,B. breve IDCC 4401,E. faecium IDCC 2102,L. rhamnosus IDCC 3201,L. acidophilus IDCC 3302,L. casei IDCC 3451,L. plantarum IDCC 3501,L. helveticus IDCC 3801 | 1.0 × 1010 | 39 | 53 | 26 | 21 | 13 | 32 | 4 weeks | Global symptoms | Overall IBS symptom relief: males 3.54 ± 0.42 vs 2.69 ± 0.44, females 3.48 ± 0.32 vs 2.40 ± 0.28 |